Chappaqua Personal Injury Blog

Law Office of Todd J. Krouner
  • rss
  • Home
  • About Us
  • New York Personal Injury Lawyers

Letter to the New York Times Regarding Doctor Medical Malpractice Exemption

admin | June 16, 2009

June 15, 2009

Letters to the Editor
The New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

Re:    Obama Open To Reining In Medical Suits: Bargaining Chip Seen in Health Overhaul, Sheryl Gay Stolberg and Robert Pear, A1, June 15, 2009

Dear Madam or Sir:

In the June 15, 2009 edition of The New York Times, President Obama reportedly seeks to immunize doctors from medical malpractice lawsuits if they adhere to standard guidelines.  From the perspective of a LASIK malpractice lawyer, it is a dumb idea.

First, who will draft the guidelines?  Following a $7.25 Million LASIK malpractice verdict in 2005, seven LASIK surgeons drafted a White Paper to promulgate such guidelines for LASIK surgery, to ensure that no such verdict would be duplicated.  In the process, they obliterated a decade of medical knowledge and claimed there were no standards.  They did not do so in the interest of medicine, but explicitly to dampen the “considerable anxiety” among their fellow refractive surgeons following the verdict.

Second, who will serve as the administrative referees?  In a case last week, one seemingly qualified eye doctor actually admitted that his version of the Hippocratic Oath actually meant, in part, “First, harm no ophthalmologist.”

Third, if the profession is incapable of throwing out serial offenders now, who will address this issue later?  In President Obama’s hometown of Chicago, Dr. Nicholas Caro has been sued more than 40 times. Still, he performs LASIK surgery.

Fourth, why would doctors want to trade in their judgment to follow guidelines like robots? The best defense of any medical malpractice claim is the doctor’s exercise of his sound professional judgment.

If the SEC could not protect us from Bernie Madoff, why should the public be comfortable having a similar bureaucracy created to dispense “justice” to victims of medical malpractice?

Respectfully submitted,

Todd J. Krouner

For more information regarding LASIK surgery and LASIK medical malpractice, please visit http://www.krounerlaw.com/ or call 914-769-8700.

 


Todd J. Krouner has obtained the two largest verdicts in the history of LASIK medical malpractice. If you have suffered an injury, or complications, due to LASIK or other eye surgery, and would like a free, confidential consultation, please contact us at info@krounerlaw.com.


 

Related Articles:

  • TLC’s Improper LASIK Patient Screening and Bankrupt Business Model
  • The Wild, Wild West Of LASIK
  • Informed Consent
  • THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND TIME BOMB OF POST LASIK ECTASIA
  • FDA To Study LASIK Patient Satisfaction
Categories
LASIK Malpractice, LASIK Surgery, Medical Malpractice
Tags
LASIK medical malpractice lawyer, LASIK Surgery, medical malpractice exemption
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« DR. WILSON HORSLEY SUED FOR LASIK MALPRACTICE - PRESS RELEASE FDA To Study LASIK Patient Satisfaction »

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Visit Our Website

  • New York Personal Injury Website

Categories

  • LASIK Malpractice
  • LASIK Surgery
  • Law & Information
  • Medical Malpractice

Recent Posts

  • TLC’s Improper LASIK Patient Screening and Bankrupt Business Model
  • The Wild, Wild West Of LASIK
  • Informed Consent
  • How Safe is LASIK? The Tiger Woods of Medical Procedures?
  • THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND TIME BOMB OF POST LASIK ECTASIA
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1